Monday, April 1, 2013

My Problem with People’s Participation


My problem with people’s participation permeates on governmental affairs such as, but not limited to the practice of the right of suffrage, involvement on national/local legislation, and adherence to rules and regulations. This tackles a vast extent of concern to the very gamut of good governance  itself where rule of law, transparency, responsiveness, consensus oriented, equity and inclusiveness, effectiveness and efficiency, accountability, and participation should be observed in totality to achieve the utmost public service served to the hoi polloi. The lack or the mediocre participation of the citizens towards nation building doesn’t only impede progress but also to losing the sense of a democratic scheme. Poor people’s participation for one nation state leads to the election of corrupt officials, elected corrupt officials then in return would disperse unpleasant public service which then clamoured by the people who they elected by themselves. Not only that, bad people’s participation also disrupts national/local legislation through referendum and plebiscite, and consequently leading to non-adherence or no familiarity to statutes enacted. To sum-up the damage of what an awful people’s participation could provide, headache or hell maybe the term appropriate to give as it leaves the type of the government which is for the people, by the people, and of the people into a fiasco.

One fresh example of this problem dates back to March 30, 2013. In the midst of the holy week, a barangay assembly was set pursuant to presidential proclamation no. 342, declaring the last Saturday of March as Barangay Assembly days. All eyes were set for one of the grandest nationwide synchronized activity designed for the purpose of a getting the government closer to the people. 

According to the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG):

The proclamation is also in accordance with Section 397(b) of the Local Government Code of 1991, which mandates all barangays throughout the country to hold simultaneous Barangay Assemblies at least twice a year and undertake the following activities: Presentation of accomplishment and financial reports; discussion of problems, issues, and concerns affecting the barangay, particularly on solid waste management and the proliferation of illegal drugs and other illegal activities; discussion on effects of and mitigating measures relative to the El Niño phenomenon; and other prevailing concerns. Being the basic political unit of our country, the barangay is an important vehicle for eliciting citizen opinion on pressing issues affecting the local community and mobilizing participation in local and national programs and projects.
The Barangay Assembly is the most appropriate venue for clarifying issues, discussing community concerns and problems, offering suggestions to improve the delivery of basic services, and proposing income-generating projects to improve the quality of life of local residents. Punong barangays would do well to utilize the day to update their registry of inhabitants, especially in barangays located in the metropolis where there are many transients, and in areas just outside Metro Manila where housing developments have mushroomed. Residents of barangays are encouraged to participate in this twice-a-year activity to air their concerns and problems, offer suggestions to improve their local communities, and propose livelihood, sanitation, beautification, and peace and order projects. All residents should be involved in community initiatives to make this basic political unity fully functional and productive.


The paramount aim of the barangay assembly is to make the government closer to the people. This is the right time to redress their grievances and to be closely seated to the officials, looking at their eyeballs and given the chance to ask their stand on a public interest. The barangay assembly permits you to hold the mic and, for a moment, be the media man of your own. But when what should have been a flawless system turns out to be just purely an idea, this 21 year old political animal calls for dire after a brunt on a traumatic scene seen firsthand.

I attended the event myself as I always do. Been attending semi-annual barangay assemblies since my term as an SK chairman ended. To my dismay, again, the barangay assembly was taken for granted by many of the residents of our barangay. There are some who attended were more concerned about the raffle prizes, some were present only for the compliance of 4P’s policy to attend barangay assemblies, and some just signed in and left afterwards. Well, there are those who attentively participated in the activity though they were only a handful. I am not even sure if it was officially declared as quorum. The most frustrating part was those members of the community who were successful professionals of their own lives weren't there and most of those who attended where from the ordinary laymen sector. The most common response when asked why they did not attend the activity is that, they don’t like the officials who, according to them, were only seated in the position only because of money. Who elected those bastards at the first place? By choosing not to vote the right candidate or influencing an ocean of voters to choose the right man on the right job, men and women who possess the intellect to persuade the voting public to do the right move  but chose to hide on their shell reluctant of their ideas are indirectly voting the wrong politicians.


Looking at the barangay assembly in a political perspective, the Republic Act 7160 or also known as Local Government Code of 1991provides:


Section 397. Composition; Meetings. -

(a) There shall be a barangay assembly composed of all persons who are actual residents of the barangay for at least six (6) months, fifteen (15) years of age or over, citizens of the Philippines, and duly registered in the list of barangay assembly members.

Section 398. Powers of the Barangay Assembly. - The barangay assembly shall:
(a) Initiate legislative processes by recommending to the sangguniang barangay the adoption of measures for the welfare of the barangay and the city or municipality concerned;

(b) Decide on the adoption of initiative as a legal process whereby the registered voters of the barangay may directly propose, enact, or amend any ordinance; and

(c) Hear and pass upon the semestral report of the sangguniang barangay concerning its activities and finances.



Sec 397, par. A, reminds me of “the youth is the future of our motherland” by Dr. Jose Rizal. Politics is not an old man’s game and the youth sector should be involved in it for a better foundation of the future generation. Sad to say, aside from me only toddlers who were with their mothers were deemed to be the members of the next generation were present in the assembly. 


It’s very enticing to think that the Local Government Code of 1991 arranged an activity, somehow, to consult the stakeholders of every ordinance to enact, projects to propose, basic services needed, and to correct shortcomings and mismanagement. I remember the time when I had my OJT in Municipal Planning and Development Office when we were keeping an eye on a joint project of the LGU concerned and an academic institution called Community Based Monitoring Survey (CBMS) when we were tallying pieces of information vital for legislation. In that point I realized how crucial for a Local Government Unit to take an in-depth view of the community’s standing. If the quality of life of the people depends on the public service they receive, the quality of public service lives and dies with the info it has with its people. We complain a lot, we get involved a little – true!



In line with the conduct of Barangay Assembly Day, the barangays shall undertake compliance to DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2010-149 dated December 14, 2010 re: Posting of Barangay Budget, Statement of Income and Expenditures and other Barangay Financial Transactions and Annual Procurement Plan. 


If in chase of the realm of good governance and advocating a zero corruption, the barangay is the best place to start.  Planning to help lessen an uprooted problem of graft and corruption in the diverse facets in government? I suggest you begin in the grassroots level, the barangay, as the basic political unit of the state. To shun corruption, a wary ear to public disclosure of all public transactions is the best way to do it, and the barangay assembly which happens twice a year divulges income, expenditures, and transactions to the constituents are very much worthy to dissect.

With the May elections fast approaching, we will soon be hearing campaign jingles and a lot of political rallies on the streets. Soon to be showered with promises and idealism, electing a new set of leaders isn’t the main answer. We can’t expect change in the society if we leave it all to them. Allowing government watchdogs to be solely responsible for corrupt officials, they can’t do it alone and perhaps they are with the bad guys. Sovereignty resides from the people and all government power emanates from them (Art. 2, Sec. 1 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines) and we should at least remember that.  You don’t need to be an activist to make a change, throwing paints on the walls of an embassy, and worst, mudslinging on alleged corrupt officials. Let’s do it in a non-barbaric manner and I assure you “yes we can.”

No comments:

Post a Comment